GRE ARGUMENT ESSAY-7

GRE Argument Essay Samples

GRE Argument Essay 1 | GRE Argument Essay 2 | GRE Argument Essay 3 | GRE Argument Essay 4 | GRE Argument Essay 5 | GRE Argument Essay 6 | GRE Argument Essay 7 | GRE Argument Essay 8 | GRE Argument Essay 9 | GRE Argument Essay 10

Argument:
The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis.

�In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an increasing number of graduates took jobs at small, general practice firms. Even though large firms usually offer much higher salaries, law school graduates are choosing to work for the smaller firms most likely because they experience greater job satisfaction at smaller firms. In a survey of first-year students at a leading law school, most agreed with the statement that earning a high salary was less important to them than job satisfaction. This finding suggests that the large, corporate firms of Megalopolis will need to offer graduates more benefits and incentives and reduce the number of hours they must work.�

Essay
For the young and the aspiring the most important thing is to realize their worth. That is why the author of the article has made the above observations. The writer says that the law school graduates in Megalopolis prefer to join small firms despite a lower salary since these small firms offer more job satisfaction. Even if the large firms offer more income, they do not offer enough opportunities that a fresh law graduate can learn and gain from. Thus they prefer to join the smaller firms. The writer supports his argument with the help of a survey that shows that majority of students prefer getting job satisfaction to a handsome salary. He also says that there has been a 15 percent decline in the number of students joining large firms.

Since young students have their whole life in front of them, they are not in a hurry to gain money. Instead, they know that now is the time that they can learn and gain the most which is going to help them in their future. If they have the skill and capability, they can earn as much money as they want. And the small firms offer training of skills required in a successful profession. There is a possibility of loss of money, but the skills are not subject to loss in later life. Thus it is a better bargain to join small firms than larger firms.

The writer of the argument also says that the larger firms will have to make their vacancies attractive by offering more incentives to fresh graduates in order to make them join their firms instead of smaller firms. There is a possibility of students getting lured by lesser number of working hours and joining the larger firms instead of smaller firms.

The argument ignores many possibilities that may result in a different observation. Firstly the writer generalizes the trend to all law school graduates of Megalopolis by saying that the law school graduates find job satisfaction in smaller firms and thus prefer to join the smaller firms than larger ones. The writer also mentions a survey being conducted on first year students, where most of them agreed to the fact. However, such a survey can be misleading since it does not reflect the view of all the law school graduates. Thus to make judgments about professional preferences by a survey would be incorrect. Moreover, in the survey, the students agree that earning more money is less important than job satisfaction. However, there is no mention of them agreeing to joining smaller firms for the same. It is possible that the larger firms also have enough job opportunities that offer job satisfaction. Thus commenting on lesser number of students joining the larger firms on account of lack of professional satisfaction would be a wrong assumption. It is possible that the students do not join larger firms due to other reasons like their being far away, or due to difficult process of recruitment into the firms, making it difficult for the students to join these firms. Thus saying that there is a decline in the number of students joining large firms due of lesser job satisfaction could be a wrong assumption on which the argument is based.

The last part of the argument says that the larger firms should provide benefits and incentives like lesser working hours to attract more law students. Considering the findings of the statement true, it can be said that if the students choose to join the smaller firms that gratify their professional satisfaction over getting more salary, then such incentives could not be attractive enough to lure them to larger firms. Lesser working hours would also mean lesser experience and thus lesser job satisfaction.

Thus the argument proves to be weak in many respects. It ignores many possibilities that could affect the findings of the writer. The above discussion proves that the writer has ignored many aspects that could result in the same actions of the law school graduates.

GRE Argument Essay Samples

GRE Argument Essay 1 | GRE Argument Essay 2 | GRE Argument Essay 3 | GRE Argument Essay 4 | GRE Argument Essay 5 | GRE Argument Essay 6 | GRE Argument Essay 7 | GRE Argument Essay 8 | GRE Argument Essay 9 | GRE Argument Essay 10

Like this Page

CLICK this button to recommend this page to Google.

   Spread The Word / Bookmark this content

Digg this Post to del.icio.us Post to Furl Post to Netscape.com